California’s third-busiest port shut down some of its gates and marine terminals for a third day Wednesday as truckers protesting a gig-work law that could take 70,000 drivers off the road blocked access to the operation.
Management at the Oakland International Container Terminal decided to close operations due to the independent trucker protest, and the port’s three other marine terminals are effectively shut down for trucks, port spokesman Robert Bernardo said. Some vessel-labor operations were under way.
SSA Marine Inc., the largest terminal operator at Oakland, shut down all operations for the day Tuesday, he said.
Protests began across California last week after the Supreme Court on June 30 refused to review a case challenging the application of Assembly Bill 5 to truckers. The law, passed in 2019, requires workers satisfy a three-part test to be considered independent contractors, or else be seen as employees entitled to job benefits. About 70,000 truck owner-operators in the state must now comply with the law.
The trucking industry relies on contractors -- who until now have had flexibility to operate on their own terms -- and has fought to be exempt from state regulations for years.
“Ongoing protests will only drive Oakland customers away and encourage them to take their business to other seaports,” Bernardo said. “They need to take their message to Sacramento.”
After ranking as the fourth-busiest hub in the US just a few years ago, the Port of Oakland now barely cracks the top 10. Container traffic fell for three straight months through May on an annual basis as bottlenecks mount.
Import dwell time is rising at the fastest pace on the West Coast, with containers now sitting at the terminal for an average of 17.5 days, up from 12.4 last week, according to supply-chain data provider project44.
Bill Aboudi, president of trucking company Oakland Port Services, said truckers are planning to continue protesting every day until their concerns are heard.
“One day is OK and it doesn’t hurt the terminal,” he said. “But on the third they’re really hurting, and the fourth day they might retaliate.”
Dockworkers Affected
When faced with the demonstration outside of the ports, some dockworkers chose not to enter the terminal, Bernardo said.
The guiding principles of their labor organization -- the International Longshore and Warehouse Union -- state that “every picket line must be respected as it were our own.”
The union said in a statement on Twitter that it supports AB5. Farless Dailey III, the ILWU’s Local 10 president, said in a separate statement that “workers stood by on health and safety, as is permitted in our contract when conditions at the terminals present a risk.”
The ILWU contract that lapsed at the start of the month established union members have a right to refuse to cross legitimate and bona fide picket lines without being in violation of their labor duties.
The ILWU is currently negotiating a new contract for 22,000 dockworkers across 29 West Coast ports with the Pacific Maritime Association., which represents more than 70 employers. Discussions for a new agreement started on May 10 in San Francisco, and the most recent accord expired on July 1.
Both parties have reaffirmed their commitment to avoiding disruptions even as the expiration open the doors to strikes, lockouts and stoppages.
On Monday, ILWU International President Willie Adams expressed support for the 115,000 US rail workers as their labor-bargaining process enters a White House mediation phase after 2 1/2 years of failed discussions resulted in workers threatening to strike this week.
With the Biden administration’s intervention, the unions operating at 30 railroads won’t be able to strike at least until September.
“They heroically stayed on the job without a contract or a raise,” Adams said. “It is beyond time for the private railroad companies to reach a fair agreement with the rail workers who delivered the goods -- and the profits.”
