Has Beijing brought a knife to a trade war gunfight?
That’s certainly the way it looks at first glance. Plans to slap levies on $3 billion of U.S. goods affect about 2 percent of China’s imports from the country, compared to the roughly 10 percent of trade in the opposite direction that will be penalized under the U.S.‘s plans to impose tariffs on $50 billion of goods from China.
A 15 percent tariff will be levied on fruit, nuts, wine and ethanol, which together amount to another $1 billion or so a year, while the same rates will be levied on, respectively, aluminum scrap and steel pipe.
In dollar terms, the restrictions on recycled aluminum will probably be the most significant—but considering that China has been trying to eliminate most imports of non-ferrous scrap anyway, they’ll largely be accelerating an ongoing process rather than reversing any trend.
Bigger categories of imports such as soybeans ($13.8 billion), cars and auto parts ($13.6 billion), aircraft ($12.6 billion) and integrated circuits ($8.7 billion), have largely been spared.
If you take that as a sign of weakness, think again. As Gadfly and others have argued, the likeliest outcome of a trade war is that participants blow themselves up rather than inflict damage on the enemy. By imposing a few largely cosmetic penalties that hit hardest on industries—agriculture and primary metals—that have supported President Donald Trump’s trade policies, Beijing is firing a warning shot but not truly going on the offensive.
Structurally, China is in the stronger position, with exports to the U.S. (mobile phones, clothing, computers, toys) that are much more dominant as a share of American imports and hit directly at the hip pockets of consumers.
Keeping its powder dry while posing as the real free trader in the dispute will put Beijing in a strong position for the diplomatic battle that lies ahead. That’s what should really worry Washington.