The National Association of Waterfront Employers (NAWE) has submitted comments to the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) strongly opposing the Administration’s proposed twenty-five percent tariff on imported Ship-to-Shore gantry cranes. NAWE asserts that this tariff would significantly harm U.S. economic and national security interests while failing to address the intended concerns of cybersecurity risks associated with Chinese imports.
NAWE’s comments highlight five key areas of concern, which are as follows:
2. National Security: Tariffs are an inappropriate tool for addressing national security risks, including cybersecurity. These risks would be better addressed through ongoing federal rulemaking efforts and the substantial investments already made by U.S. marine terminal operators in securing their networks and cargo handling equipment.
3. Operational Efficiency: Ship-to-Shore cranes are vital for managing the increasing volume of imports and exports moving through our ports. The proposed tariff would make it prohibitively expensive for NAWE members to upgrade and replace essential equipment, potentially disrupting the flow of commerce and limiting the types of vessels and cargo volume that U.S. ports can handle.
4. Workplace Safety: Increased costs could result in dangerous working conditions for the union waterfront workers hired by marine terminal operators, as ports may delay necessary equipment upgrades and maintenance as a result of the proposed tariff.
5. Investment Concerns: The significant increase in costs for ship-to-shore cranes, which range from $15 million to $20 million each, would undermine the financial investments already made by NAWE members to maintain and enhance port infrastructure.
Several of NAWE’s member companies submitted additional comments on the proposed tariff which can be found at the USTR’s comment portal here. Currently, the USTR has remained firm on the August 1, 2024, effective date for the ship-to-shore crane tariff proposal.
