b'16American Journal of Transportation ajot.comUS BL Exports/only to China Top 20 Carriers 2020 - 2019Rank Carrier 2020 2019 Change Change %1 China Ocean Shipping Co.263,656 205,910 57,747 28.04%2 Ocean Network Express PTE LTD 260,260 243,895 16,365 6.71%3 Orient Overseas Container Line 249,658 167,396 82,262 49.14%4 CMA-CGM 236,888 205,785 31,103 15.11%5 Evergreen Line 224,796 203,037 21,759 10.72%6 MSC - Mediterrean Shipping Co.168,020 129,008 39,012 30.24%7 Maersk Line 137,978 100,991 36,988 36.62%8 APL Co. PTE LTD - NOL Group 115,474 163,377 -47,903 -29.32%9 Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.104,796 123,233 -18,437 -14.96%10 Hapag Lloyd AG 64,107 78,521 -14,414 -18.36%11 Hyundai Merchant Marine 58,930 67,681 -8,751 -12.93%12 Zim Integrated Shipping Services 50,872 45,360 5,512 12.15%13 SM Line Corp.5,742 7,107 -1,365 -19.20%14 Hamburg Sud 5,368 5,764 -396 -6.87%15 Pacific International Lines LTD2,993 6,144 -3,150 -51.28%16 Wan Hai Lines LTD 2,201 50,417 -48,216 -95.64%17 WWL Americas LLC 673 924 -251 -27.16%18 Safmarine Container Lines 6 5 1 19.76%19 Dole Ocean Cargo Express 2 0 2 0.00%20 Kawaski Kisen Kaisha LTD 0 0 0 0.00%all other -0 -0 0 -0.00%Total TEUs 1,952,421 1,804,555 147,866 8.19%US BL Import/only from China Top 20 VOCC 2020 - 2019Rank VOCC 2020 2019 Change Change %1 Evergreen Line 1,307,969 1,264,740 43,229 3.42%2 CMA-CGM 1,157,220 934,044 223,176 23.89%3 China Ocean Shipping Co. 1,108,262 1,123,326 -15,064 -1.34%4 Ocean Network Express PTE LTD 1,105,061 1,214,987 -109,926 -9.05%5 MSC - Mediterrean Shipping Co.998,564 779,768 218,796 28.06%6 Maersk Line 903,726 769,778 133,949 17.40%7 Orient Overseas Container Line 729,378 704,920 24,458 3.47%8 American President Lines 526,831 717,539 -190,708 -26.58%9 Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.517,308 546,763 -29,455 -5.39% (CTTPPcontinued from page 13) (TPPcontinued from page 14)10 Hyundai Merchant Marine 471,635 445,877 25,758 5.78% 500 million people and over 13% oftradingpatternsandpractices.The 11 Zim Integrated Shipping Services 421,582 323,071 98,511 30.49% global trade. purpose of the U.S.-Japan trade agree-12 Hapag Lloyd AG 374,400 437,085 -62,684 -14.34% CPTPP was based upon the origi- ment, from Trumps perspective, was nalTPP,butitcutorcurtailed22to score a quick political win.13 Matson Navigation Co. Inc. 198,949 109,021 89,928 82.49% measureswhichwereurgedontheThelimited,agriculture-centric 14 SM Line Corp.195,039 208,409 -13,370 -6.42% agreement by the U.S. These provi- U.S.-Japantradeagreementpoten-15 Hamburg Sud 164,894 149,409 15,485 10.36% sions have been suspended, and thetially allows the U.S. to sell more beef, 16 Wan Hai Lines LTD 147,024 140,353 6,671 4.75% use of that word presumably signaledpork,fruits,andnutstoJapan,but 17 Pacific International Lines LTD 32,403 243,272 -210,869 -86.68% that the CPTPP-11 might be willingTPP would have gone much farther, to reinstate them in some form if theeliminatingtariffsonU.S.tobacco 18 Safmarine Container Lines 739 205 534 260.62% U.S. were to rejoin the agreement.and soybeans and establishing a level 19 G Two (G2) Ocean US LTD268 94 174 185.11% of U.S. rice that would be allowed to 20 CPJQ 136 64 72 112.15% iP l aw ando rder enter Japan duty-free. The agreement all others 1,443 1,777 -333 -18.76% The suspended provisions includeglaringly omitted any mention of the the intellectual property chapter, whichservices economy and automobilesTotal TEUs 10,362,833 10,114,500 248,333 2.46% providedstringentrequirementsforallowing Trump to threaten to slap tar-Stats provided by Datamine/Descartes (CTTPPcontinued on page 19) iffs on Japanese cars that could have cost U.S. consumers billions of dol-lars. (Ultimately, the former president declined to impose those levies.)HadtheU.S.joinedtheTPP,it would have realized around $131 bil-lion in increased real income per year, according to a report from the American ActionForum,whileCFRprojected that TPP would have cost China $18 billion per year in real income. Chinas initiationoftheRCEPreversesthis dynamic, noted Tom Lee, a data and policy analyst at the American Action Forum. AccordingtoLee,RCEPis projected to increase real income for the United States only $1 billion per year, while China will increase its real income by about $85 billion a year.ButitsworthnotingthatRCEP wontgointoforceuntilsixmonths after its been ratified by at least six ASEANmembersandatleastthree from outside that organization. The rat-ification process has just barely begun customs brokers&freight forwarders and could take years to complete. That www . jfmoran.com: 800.944.1041 timeline could give the Biden adminis-tration the space it needs to reassert its professeddiplomaticandtradegoals for the U.S. in the Asia-Pacific region.'